Insights from Margaret Barker’s “Temple Themes in Christian Worship”

 The Secret Temple Tradition

This begins a series of posts in which I hope to share some of the most exciting insights provided by biblical scholar Margaret Barker in her most recent book, Temple Themes in Christian Worship (T&T Clark International, 2007). Margaret Barker has become well known and well respected in LDS circles because of her research into the Temple, the use of Temple imagery and rituals among the early Christians, and other topics of great interest to LDS readers. Anyone with interests in religious studies should seriously look at her many amazing books. She is one of my favorite authors and I will dedicate many posts to what I have learned from her research. I had the great privilege of meeting her at the 2007 Society of Biblical Literature conference in San Diego, where she spoke on the topic of Melchizedek at an LDS-themed session. LDS readers will find many of her ideas similar to their own beliefs.

You really should read this book, but until you have the opportunity, I hope to share with you some of the points I found most inspiring (although to truly do so would mean reprinting most of the whole book right here).

To begin her study of “temple themes in Christian worship,” Barker begins by giving evidence that there was, in fact, a “secret tradition” of beliefs/practices that had its roots in the ancient Temple of Solomon. Many of the early Church Fathers knew of “authentic Christian traditions not recorded in the Bible” (p. 1).

She cites St. Basil the Great, one of the influential Cappodocian Fathers, as saying:

Of the dogma and kerygma which are preserved in the Church, we have some from teachings in writing, and the others we have received from the tradition of the apostles, handed down in a mystery (On the Holy Spirit 66) (1, emphasis mine).

and also:

“The apostles and fathers who prescribed from the beginning the matters that concerned the Church, guarded in secret and unspoken, the holy things of the mysteries…A whole day would not be long enough from me to go through all the unwritten mysteries of the Church” (On the Holy Spirit 67) (1-2).

The Apostles had passed on teachings that Jesus shared with them in private –the mysteries (Greek mysterion) or “secrets” of the Kingdom of God (Mark 4:11). For Barker, the Kingdom of God is the place of God’s Throne, the Holy of Holies. When Jesus spoke of the Kingdom, he was speaking of the Temple. Jesus had passed on to select disciples the true practices of the ancient Temple; practices not recorded in the Scriptures, nor written down by Jesus’ disciples.  This Temple knowledge was to be passed on unwritten–in secret.

She notes that Josephus recorded a similar practice (of passing on secret traditions) among the Essenes. Entry into their community was very strict, and new members had to swear an oath “invoking the living God and calling to witness his almighty right hand, and the Spirit of God, the incomprehensible, and the Seraphim and Cherubim, who have insight into all, and the whole heavenly host” (Jewish War 2:138 ) (5). The Essene swore that he would reveal none of the sect’s secrets, even under torture.

For the earliest Christians, knowledge of this secret Temple tradition was an important factor in distinguishing true believers from heretics (although this perspective seems to have been reversed later on). Clement of Alexandria identified heretics as those who did not have knowledge of the secret truths: “They do not enter in as we enter in, through the tradition of the Lord, by drawing aside the curtain(Miscellanies 7:17) (15).

Barker astutely interprets the reference to “the curtain” as an allusion to the Temple veil, and that knowledge gained beyond “the curtain” must have been the sacred truths of the Holy of Holies, reserved for the high priests. “This knowledge concerned the vision of God,” she says, “and had been transmitted by a few ‘having been imparted unwritten by the apostles’ (Miscellanies 6:7)” (15).

The Old Testament potrays the Holy of Holies as having been restricted to the high priests alone. For Christians, Jesus was the great High Priest who had brought them the secrets of the Heavenly Holy of Holies. Besides the knowledge, it appears that Christ also passed on his high priesthood. The early Christians knew John the Beloved to be both a prophet and a high priest (Eusebius, Church History 3:31). Likewise, James was a high priest of the Jerusalem church, and is known to have shared a “secret teaching” that was revealed to him and Peter by the Lord (13).

Furthermore, the Christians, as a group, were “the new royal high priesthood,” according to Origen, and thus worthy to see the Word of God and receive the mysteries of the Temple (Homily 5, On Numbers) (12). Elsewhere in the book, Barker specifically refers to this priesthood as a restoration of “the older priesthood of Melchizedek” (57, emphasis in original).

Jesus brought a restoration of the ancient temple practices that had existed in the First Temple. Temple themes and practices pervaded early Christian beliefs and rituals. Although the original forms and meanings were obscured over time, many themes from these Temple roots can be found in early Christian writings, liturgies, rituals, and architecture. While the early Christians were preserving the ancient Temple tradition, the contemporary Jews were establishing an identity that emphasized “a tradition that had no place for the temple and priesthood” (14).

Margaret Barker’s research in temple traditions gives ample evidence that there was a tradition in early Christianity of a secret teaching that was handed down unwritten from the time of Jesus and the Apostles. It was believed to be the authentic ancient temple tradition, along with its priesthood, restored.

Subscribe To Site:

This entry was posted in Temple and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.

7 Comments

  1. Posted June 2, 2008 at 11:08 am | Permalink

    Excellent post! I love to read these kinds of writings from early Church Fathers because it opens up our view to the religious life of the early Christians, and gives us a glimpse of what they believed and practiced.

    Hugh Nibley has written extensively on the 40-day literature, writings about the things that Christ did during the 40 days he was with his disciples after his resurrection, which is only briefly mentioned in the Bible (Acts 1:3). What did he do during these 40 days? The Bible doesn’t tell us much, only that he spoke “of the things pertaining to the kingdom of God.” Nibley believes it was during this time that Christ imparted the sacred mysteries to his disciples, an endowment, something that he had promised them earlier that they would receive (Luke 24:49).

    In Acts 1:3 it speaks of Christ showing himself alive by “many infallible proofs.” Infallible proofs comes from the Greek tekmeriois, meaning “sure signs or tokens” according to Daniel Raynes Goodwin, a 19th century Episcopal clergyman (“Notes on the Revision of the New Testament Version” (1883), 98).

    It’s interesting that both of these scriptures mention Christ telling the disciples to wait for the “promise” of the Father. Could this be a calling and election, a more sure word of prophecy? (2 Peter 1:10, 19).

  2. David Larsen
    Posted June 2, 2008 at 11:18 am | Permalink

    Very insightful comment, Bryce! Thank you! You should check out M. Barker’s paper entitled “The Secret Tradition” at http://www.margaretbarker.com/Papers/SecretTradition.pdf
    She gives a great non-LDS evaluation of this tradition that LDS readers would enjoy.

  3. Posted June 2, 2008 at 3:17 pm | Permalink

    Great Post!

    I don’t remember ever seeing those quotes by St. Basil the Great.

    -David

  4. Posted June 2, 2008 at 8:21 pm | Permalink

    Nice Blog! Keep it up!

  5. Posted June 2, 2008 at 11:01 pm | Permalink

    Thanks for the post, I have only dabbled into reading on the early Christian mysteries/temple issues. Enough to know there’s real substance there, but not enough to actually speak intelligently, so it’s nice to have a blog giving good digestible nuggets since I don’t have time to really read properly right now. Keep it up!

  6. David Larsen
    Posted June 3, 2008 at 8:48 am | Permalink

    Thank you all for visiting the site!

    David-I hadn’t seen those quotes before, either. I have Mrs. Barker to thank for her great research skills!

  7. Petro Invictus
    Posted August 20, 2008 at 11:07 am | Permalink

    This was the most intriguing post I have read in a period, and has shown me the direction into which I should proceed with my research for my book.

    Let my clarify, I am writing a book titled: The House of Macedon, a Living Bible of Light, in which I intend to reveal the oral tradition or the Orphic mysteries and its integration into the early Christian tradition. The fifth book of the Old Testament I am working on at the moment is titled Deuteronomy, and by accident I selected five working titles I intend to focus on: The Hidden Temple, The Secret Book, The Holy Quest, The Sun on Cross and The Blessed Macedon.

    In my research insofar I have come to certain facts that reveal a continuation of the monotheistic mysteries among the ancient Macedonians. You can take a look at the following extracts:

    http://issuu.com/petro_invictus/docs/orphic_mysteries
    http://issuu.com/petro_invictus/docs/the_dionysus_creed_in_macedonia

    The Hidden Temple seems to have been the core of the Dionysus Creed and the Orphic mysteries. And I believe that most of it has been integrated into the Christian mysteries, particularly in the monastic life…

    All comments are welcome…

    Thank you

2 Trackbacks

  1. [...] of his first posts talks about the insights he’s gained from reading Margaret Barker’s recent book [...]

  2. By In the Company of Angels | Heavenly Ascents on October 27, 2009 at 5:19 am

    [...] This theme is well-established in the research of Margaret Barker as well. I share an excerpt here from her recent Temple Themes in Christian Worship (for reviews of this book, see here, and my own reviews starting here): [...]